|
导读：此文是500字的澳洲review作文，开头要写博物馆大概都有什么东西，有什么内容，什么区域。博物馆中令人难以置信的是策展人对游客的信任程度。古希腊雕塑如此珍贵，周围没有任何障碍可以保护游客免受游客的侵害，也没有人站在你周围留意你，让你对整个环境感到不舒服。有时我甚至在没有注意到的情况下意外地靠近某些工作。博物馆的有趣之处在于，物品不是逻辑上有序的，也不是系统地组织起来的。这就像进入一个仙境，在那里你的感官享受幻想的土地主题，这些主题在彼此分开的不同房间中彼此不同，在聚宝盆中有数百个物体，但实际上它们中没有一个看起来与地方一致或与您可以查明的类别：例如，日本茶馆位于展示中世纪时期艺术品的部分。据说这个专注于时装设计的展览包含大量的服装可穿戴服装，这些服装像拼贴画一样以令人发指的方式排列。 “最近的收购”房间是我最喜欢的空间之一，我特别喜欢奥林匹克大锅模型的微型模型。该艺术品由200多个铜花瓣组成，每个花瓣都由我们携带，并且一个接一个地组装在辐射杆上方。它体现了所有国家与全球范围内的合同，形成和组成联合力量的观念。在奥运会中使用的原型模型真正引人注目，其工艺能够满足细节和细节的原始构造。模型中的每个铜瓣都是独一无二的。The incredible thing about the museum is the degree of trust that the curators have for visitors. So precious an ancient Greek sculpture could be, there are no barriers set around that protect it from visitors and no people standing around keeping an eye on you, making you feel uncomfortable with the whole environment. Sometimes I just accidentally leaned too close to some of the work without even noticing. What was interesting about the museum is that things are not ordered logically and organize systematically. It is like going inside a wonderland where your senses feast on fantasy-land subjects that are distinct from each other in different rooms separated from each other and hundreds of objects in the cornucopia and none of them actually seem congruent with the place or relates to a category that you can pinpoint: for instance, the Japanese tea house was located in the section which has display of medieval-period artwork. The exhibition which is said to be focusing on fashion design contains tons of clothing wearable outfits that are arranged in outrageous manner like a collage. The “Recent Acquisitions” room was one of my favorite space and I am particular fond of the miniature models of the Olympic cauldron model. The artwork is formed of more than 200 copper petals with each of them being carried by as let's and one by one being assembled above radiating poles. It epitomizes the idea that all the countries are contract to, and forming and constituting a joint force on the global scale. The model of the origin one used in Olympics is truly remarkable with craftsmanship that catered for meticulous details and construct at the same scale of the original. Each of the copper petals in the model is unique.
At first glance of the exhibition, the arrangement and the juxtaposition of items give an impression that things were arranged in chronological order but then as you peer into really deep inside, the relationship between different objects, you find that each work specifically pertain to the kind of fashion capital in which it was designed. this kind of interaction and confidential conflict systems of categorization that that took place in the exhibition and the result is like a postmodern collage of artwork. Although it is hard to find specific things because of such a design of the creative spaces in the museum, it makes things enjoyable because exploring the museum is a journey that is like a treasure hunt and makes you feel drawn into the meticulous detail and the playfulness of all the work and objects that communicate to you as you find yourself wrapped in layers and layers of blooming colors always longs addictive for the and there always surprises in other rooms that await you at the next turn of the corner. Its complications and convolutions create a sense of mystical magical reality that is spectacular and exciting. One of the artifacts I remember is one of Da Vinci's note books, which was placed behind the wall covertly at the Medieval and Renaissance section, and The Hypnertotomachia Poliphili, an aesthetically tasteful book from the 1400s, which was actually stashed away in the small drawer of the same region. Also, in the theater session, the arrangement of objects feels as if whirlwind has rampaged the place with a collection of 21st-century-era objects such as current movie posters and sketches of 1960 plays and the central artifacts – the two patents of theaters from the 1660s, are scattered amongst the backdrop of less important pieces of work. The way that it arranges all the things is really intriguing for me and I don't really have the answer of why it was arranged this way. I like the way that the diversity of objects from different periods break what the conventional paradigm or structure of the ordinary can accommodate. It is really interesting for the display to play with objects in such way. My speculation is probably that this is trying to break away from classicism and rules of the past, looking at the truth of things from a postmodern angle where reality is a projection of perceptions and it reveals different perspectives of audience’s own mind.
|
 |
|||
| 网站地图 |
