|
核心提示：英国capstone报告-英国Article Assignment-英国留学生风险管理模型作业，Module 1: Addressing Risk
Module 2: Characterising Risk
Module 3: Measuring Risk
Module 4: Management of Risk
Module 5: Bringing it all Together –
Module 5.5: Using the ERM Framework
Module 6: Financial and Political Risk*
Module 7: Risk in Using Technology*
Module 8: Environmental and Social Risk*
Module 9: Risk when Managing Human Resources*
Module 10: The future of Risk and its Management 1 October 2010
Capstone Assignment to be submitted by 3.00 PM 29 October 2010
* You may complete Modules 6, 7, 8 and 9 in a different order if you believe it will
help you plan for your Article Assignment more effectively. However, do not skip
any Modules, because they might contain information needed for your Capstone
Assignment.
capstone是最后1个报告2500字，而您现在要写的这个报告，你先把MODULES全看看，材料全看看，ISO STANDARDS也要看， 然后再认真的把这个Article Assignment 1000字的报告写好。 这个报告写的好，后面这门课程的capstone报告我还给你写，材料也就是同样的材料哦。我给老师2个压缩包，1个DOC文件，2个压缩包分别是BFA722课件，
ISO—STANDARDS。
这个是怎么用我传给你BFA722压缩包里面东西的方法：你把我给你的压缩包BFA722解压缩，然后点开BFA722课件这个文件夹，
英国capstone报告-英国Article Assignment-英国留学生风险管理模型作业然后点击那个start.html进入主页：
左边有个+的可以展开，然后你1个module，1个module展开的，点击左边展开的东西，右边就会出现具体内容材料，比如：
我这个是点了+ module1 的Thinking about risk,why management risk, and defining risk右边出来这个，然后右边红色的click here to view pdf slides.就会出现更具体的内容了。
这次你要写的报告要求在article assignment, Assessable discussions你不用看。 下面是我复制报告的要求：
再次强调，请老师认真看modules的内容，还有ISO STANDARD（这个在另外个压缩包里）， 再着手写报告。REFERENCE要做好，哈弗格式的。也要有IN TEXT 的REFERENCE。
请注意报告的相似度。不要全部摘抄网上的东西。请用自己的话说什么的或者改句子。万分谢谢。
Article Assignment 30%#p#分页标题#e#
The Tasmanian Environmental Impact Board (TEIB) is a newly-formed independent oversight body which has been jointly set up and funded by businesses, regulatory authorities and government to investigate all the risks which currently, or could potentially, impact upon the state’s environment or arise from it. Given that, for example, pesticides used overseas (but not in Tasmania) have been linked with the Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour problem, all possible risks will be considered.
The first aim of TEIB is to prepare a summary database of all environment-related risks. The database will be publicly accessible and constantly updated as new information comes to hand. It will be used as an education resource and as a springboard for further research. The long-term view is to achieve best-practice risk management by all sectors throughout the state.
You are one of the Risk Management consultants who have been engaged by TEIB to write an article on one type of risk to or from the environment.
Your Article
TEIB has categorised its initial collection of information into eight broad Review Areas, listed at the end of this document. The articles in this initial collection are quite old, and probably out of date, (and some may even be tricky to locate electronically,) so they provide only a starting point to help you identify a risk to or from the environment that you wish to write about. The bulk of your article will be informed by your independent research. You may identify and discuss any environment-related risk you consider important to the Review Area you choose, but it must be clearly a risk to or from the environment.
Your update will be a very important contribution to the database.
You are required to:
Choose one Review Area;
Locate and read the information resources provided to get an idea of the potential issues; and
Identify one environment-related risk within the Area that is potentially important. This is the risk that you will research further and write your article about.
The TEIB has specific submission requirements
This task will result in a formal written article, constructed in the same style as an academic journal article, addressing the following points:
An introduction to the issue (justify how it is a risk to or from the environment);
Why this is an important area;
How to identify the risk in Tasmania;
Can this risk be measured? If so, how?
How is the risk generally being addressed at the moment? (If it is not being addressed at all, why not?)
Is this risk generally being managed well?
How should this risk be managed on an ongoing basis?
What processes for monitoring and evaluating the management of this risk should be in place?
Is it the (sole) responsibility of business to deal with this risk?
Any other relevant comments.
The article title page must identify which Review Area (area name and number) you have chosen, as well as your specific risk choice.#p#分页标题#e#
The article file must be named in the following format: LAST NAME, first name, ID number – BFA722 Article.doc
The article must be uploaded (as a single document – no separate parts will be accepted) to the Assignment Submission section of the MyLO Home Page at any time by 3pm on the due date.
NOTE the target completion date for Module 8 – Environmental & Social Risk in the Unit Schedule (last page of the Unit Outline). You are advised to manage your time so that you can benefit from this Module prior to completing your Article.
Task Length:
Your work will be targeted at a busy corporate audience with no prior knowledge of the specific risk you write about.
Risk-related communication should be brief and to the point, particularly at this first, introductory stage. You need to get your audience's attention and be convincing enough for them to be motivated to move on to more detailed information in the near future.
The written article must not exceed 1,000 words. Headings, tables, figures, references and appendices are not included in word counts.
How your work will be evaluated
Your work will be evaluated as it would to check if it is of a standard appropriate for publication in the database. Please see the Unit Outline and the sample marking sheet on MyLO for more information.
HINT: Given that this is a research article, and that the reliability of risk-related information is extremely important, you can expect that referencing technique will be a heavily weighted assessment criterion. Please practice through the early weeks of semester, and seek training if necessary, to ensure your technique is sound before
Review Areas:
You must select ONE risk from ONE of the following areas.
Review Area 1 - Environmental Degradation and Restoration
Bell, F., D. Genske, H. Hytiris and P. Lindsay. 2000. A Survey of Contaminated Ground with Illustrative Case Histories. Land Degradation and Development. V.11(5). Pp.419-437.
Burger, J. 2002. Incorporating Ecology and Ecological Risk into Long-Term Stewardship on Contaminated Sites. Remediation. Vol 13 (1) Winter. Pp.107-119.
Hamilton, J. and W. Viscusi. 1999. How Costly is “Clean”? An analysis of the Benefits and Costs of Superfund Site Remediations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. V.18/1. Pp.2-27.
Review Area 2 - Agricultural Biotechnology Risk
Articles to form a starting point:
Ford, N. and G. Murphy. 1998. Managing Environmental Risks from Genetically Modified Organisms: the role of safety training. Environmental Management and Health. V.9/3. Pp.100-105.
Stakeholder Forum. 2003. The Stakeholder Forum on Agricultural Biotechnology. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. May.
Caswell, J. 2000. An Evaluation of Risk Analysis as Applied to Agricultural Biotechnology (with a case study of GMO labelling). Agribusiness. V.16/1. Pp.115-123.
Review Area 3 - Environmental Risk associated with Industry Groups #p#分页标题#e#
Berry, M. and D. Rondinelli. 2000. When Business and Government Clash: Environmental Crisis Management in the Carpet Industry. Environmental Quality Management. Summer. Pp.13-36.
Gerde, V. and J. Logsdon. 2001. Measuring Environmental Performance: Use of the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and other US Environmental Databases. Business Strategy and the Environment. V.10. Pp.269-285.
Giziakis, K. and E. Bardi-Giziaki. 2002. Assessing the Risk of Pollution from Ship Accidents. Disaster Prevention and Management. V.11/2. Pp.109-114.
Rezaee, Z. 2000. Help Keep the World Green. Journal of Accountancy. Nov. Pp.57-66.
Schneider, R. 2000. Knowledge and Ethical Responsibility in Industrial Disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management. V.9/2. Pp.98-104.
Tack, J. 1999. Environmental Management Systems and Stakeholders. The Case of the Belgian Electricity Sector. Greener Management International, Theme Issue. Winter. Pp.50-58.
Welsh, C. and I. Herremans. 1998. Treadsoftly: Adopting Environmental Management in the Start-up Phase. Journal of Organisational Change Management. V.11/2. Pp.145-156.
Navas-Acien, A. et al. 2002. Occupation, Exposure to Chemicals and Risk of Gliomas and Meningiomas in Sweden. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. V.42. Pp.214-227.
Walker, D. 2000. Client/Customer or Stakeholder Focus? ISO 14000 EMS as a Construction Industry Case Study. TQM Journal. V.12/1. Pp.18-25.
Bryson, N. and R. Mannix. 2001. No Elephants Hiding in the Mouseholes. Environmental Quality Management. Summer. Pp.99-103.
Review Area 4 - Extreme Risk & Disaster Management
Vasquez, E. 2001. Risk Perception Interactions in Stress and Coping Facing Extreme Risks. Environmental Management and Health. V.12/2. Pp.122-133.
West, P. 1995. Infinity Goes on Trial: The Imperatives for a Sustainable Reality. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal. V.16/8. Pp.10-16.
Beckett, R. and J. Jonker. 2002. Accountability 1000: A New Social Standard for Building Sustainability. Managerial Auditing Journal. V.17/1. Pp.36-42.
Sathiendrakumar, R. 1996. Sustainable Development: Passing Fad or Potential Reality? International Journal of Social Economics. V.23. Pp.151-163.
Van Heel, K., B. Knegtering and A. Brombacher. 1999. Safety Lifecycle Management. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. V.15. Pp.493-500.
Holtzman, R. and S. Jorgensen. 1999. Social Protection as Social Risk Management. Journal of Industrial Development. V.11. Pp.1005-1027.
Review Area 5 - Climate Change
Revkin, A. 2009, ‘Among Climate Scientists: A Dispute Over Tipping Points’, The New York Times, viewed 22 June 2009, Review Area 6 - Geological Risk
Bea, R. 2001. ‘Risk Assessment and Management of Offshore Structures’, Progress in Structural Engineering Materials. V.3(2) Pp.180-187.
Ellingwood, B. 2001. ‘Acceptable Risk Bases for Design of Structures’, Progress in Structural Engineering Materials. V.3. Pp.170-179.#p#分页标题#e#
Vasquez, E. 2001. Risk Perception Interactions in Stress and Coping Facing Extreme Risks. Environmental Management and Health. V12(2). Pp.122-133.
Review Area 7 - Sustainable Energy and the Environment
Tankersley, J. 2009. ‘Surge of college students pursuing 'clean energy' careers’, Los Angeles Times, viewed 22 June 2009, Review Area 8 - Nuclear Technology
Bauers, S. 2009, ‘Nuclear industry's new burst of energy’, The Philadelphia Enquirer (Saturday Mar. 28), viewed 22 June 2009, Fildes, J. 2009, ‘Giant laser experiment powers up’, BBC News online, viewed 22 June 2009, 指导assignmentVasquez, E. 2001. Risk Perception Interactions in Stress and Coping Facing Extreme Risks. Environmental Management and Health. V.12/2. Pp.122-133.
|
