|
指导英国assignment：组织行为学课程作业
Instructions on Assessment:评估说明
Assessment is through the presentation of a professional individual portfolio in paper and electronic versions.评估是通过介绍一个专业的个人档案和电子版本。
Structure of the Portfolio:
A contents sheet
A realistic career plan outlining your goals in the context of researched career opportunities and activities undertaken on the module (e.g. ‘Which Job Will Suit You’ and ‘Psychometric Tests’)
[20 marks]
An analysis of the recruitment practices of graduate employers demonstrating how their recruitment and selection techniques attempt to meet their organizational development needs
[20 marks]
A Self – evaluation comparing your skills and achievements with those required by a graduate employer including an action plan to address any gaps
[10 marks]
A discussion of the effectiveness of your preferred communication style for gaining graduate level employment (informed by workshop activities, the course text and your observations from attendance at a formal public meeting)
[10 marks]
A set of Appendices which must comprise the following:
Professionally produced Curriculum Vitae
Professionally produced job application covering letter
A completed Application Form for a graduate level job/placement opportunity
Report from 5 psychometric tests
A statement of ten likely interview questions (at Graduate applicant level) and appropriate responses for a graduate level position
Reflective statement on your performance in assessment centre activities (excluding interviews and psychometric tests)
Observations from your attendance at a formal public meeting
[40 marks]
A full list of Harvard references
Word limits and penalties for assignments
Word Limit – 6,000 words (This word limit applies to the total number of words in Sections 2-5 only, excluding footnotes)
If the assignment is within +10% of the stated word limit no penalty will apply. However, if the word limit exceeds the +10% limit, 10% of the mark provisionally awarded to the assignment will be deducted. For example: if the assignment is worth 70% but is above the word limit by more than 10%, a penalty of 7% will be imposed, giving a final mark of 63%.
Submission of Assessment:
All assignments must be submitted via the Undergraduate Programme Office. Each assignment must be accompanied by an Assessed Work Form which must be completed in full. The assignment will not be accepted by the Undergraduate Programme Office unless the form is completed correctly.#p#分页标题#e#
Marked assignments will be returned to students. It is advisable to retain a copy of your assignment for you own records. Your mark will be returned on the Assessed Work Form via the Undergraduate Programme Office.
Referencing your work
The Harvard method of referring to publications and of arranging references uses the author's name and the date of the publication. References are listed at the end of the text in alphabetical order by author's name. The general format of a journal reference is shown below:
Smith, J. (1999) ‘How to succeed!’, Journal of Entrepreneurs, 1 (2),pp.34-56
Author/s name and initials are listed first, followed by year of publication in brackets. Then there is the title of article and the journal where article appears, which is underlined or in italics. Finally, state the volume and issue Number (in brackets) along with the pages where article can be located.
For further information, including advice on how to cite information from the web, access the following website:
which addresses frequently asked questions in relation to the Harvard referencing system.
Plagiarism and Cheating
Your attention is drawn to the University’s stated position on plagiarism. THE WORK OF OTHERS, WHICH IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSIGNMENT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO ITS SOURCE (a full bibliography and a list of references must be submitted).
Please note that this is intended to be an individual piece of work. Action will be taken where a student is suspected of having cheated or engaged in any dishonest practice. Students are referred to the University regulations on plagiarism and other forms of academic irregularity. Students must not copy or collude with one another or present any information that they themselves have not generated.
(Some basic instruction if required here)
Learning Outcomes and Transferable skills:
This assessment will fully or partially satisfying the following learning outcomes (as stated on the teaching and learning plan):
At the end of the module students will be able to:
a) Undertake a range of activities and demonstrate appropriate personal presentation required to successfully obtain graduate level employment (including applications, interviews and a range of assessment centre activities)
b) Recognize the contribution made by recruitment and selection to organizational development
(please cut and paste relevant learning outcomes from teaching and learning plan to here)
The assessment will also assist in the development of the following transferable skills:
(please enter cross where appropriate)
Skill Element
Transferable Skill 1 2 3 4
Literacy (L) x
Communication (C) x
Working with Others (W)
Use of ICTs (I) x
Problem Solving (P) x
Managing Own Learning (M) x
Numeracy (N) x
This assessment will contribute directly to the following Undergraduate programme goals and objectives.
1. Knowledgeable about the theory and practice of international business and management
Objectives:
Students will be able to:
1. Demonstrate current knowledge and understanding of the major functional areas of business.
2. Demonstrate current knowledge of specialist functional and professional areas of business where such specialisation is informed by relevant QAA benchmarks, professional accreditation requirements and applicable international educational standards.
3. Demonstrate, through the application of knowledge to business contexts and scenarios, their abilities of analysis and synthesis.
2. Skilful in the use of personal, professional and managerial techniques and processes
Objectives:
Students will be able to:
X 1. Demonstrate the acquisition and application of a range of personal transferable skills in numeracy, literacy, communication and time management.
2. Exhibit an understanding of the needs of customers, clients and other important contacts through the demonstration of the awareness of key professional and managerial issues, problem solving and critical thinking.
3. Apply managerial and leadership techniques, including negotiation, project management, team building and decision making to business problems appropriate to their level of study.
3. Employable as graduates
Objectives:
Students will be able to:
X 1. Demonstrate a range of key skills for securing graduate employment, including self presentation e.g. in CVs, interviews and assessment centres.
X 2. Demonstrate an active awareness of the graduate labour market in order to secure, retain and develop a graduate career.
X 3. Provide evidence of direct engagement with a range of graduate employers and professional bodies.
4. Aware of ethical issues impacting on business and professional practice
Objectives:
Students will be able to:
1. Demonstrate an understanding of UK and international organisations’ approaches to Corporate Social Responsibility and their implications for organisations and individuals.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the ethical codes of professional bodies and the legal and regulatory contexts in which these operate.
3. Demonstrate an understanding of different perspectives towards organisational ethics including shareholder, stakeholder and critical approaches.
Assessment Criteria (NBS)
The first column indicates the general assessment criteria used within NBS the second column indicates the specific criteria used when marking your assessment.
Mark General Criteria Module Assessment Criteria
First (80 - 100) Excellent knowledge and appreciation for subject. Fastidious eye for detail. Assured ability to challenge received wisdom and to sustain argument or logical reasoning under these terms. Excellent performance in at least the majority of areas of the portfolio with good performance in the remainder.
First (70 - 79) Impressive knowledge and understanding. Clearly demonstrates critical appreciation. Theory and evidence are invariably related. Argument or logical reasoning is always relevant and well sustained. Excellent performance in some areas of the portfolio with good performance in the remainder
Upper Second (60 - 69) A maturing ability to relate theory and evidence, concepts and ideas is displayed. Critical appreciation is evident. Content is always relevant, generally well focused and organised. Good performance in at least the majority of areas in the portfolio with satisfactory performance in the remainder
Lower Second (50 - 59) Knowledge base is generally sound and some critical appreciation shown. Analysis usually clear but can lack some clarity of focus.
Good performance in some areas of the portfolio with satisfactory performance in the remainder
Third (40 - 49) Legitimate content but relies heavily on the descriptive. Analysis may be unsophisticated. Work may contain some use of concepts, but is poorly set out and needs an appropriate focus. Satisfactory performance in at least all but one area of the portfolio
(30 - 39) Performance shows elements of legitimate content, but is more often than not inappropriate. Unsatisfactory performance in two or more areas of the portfolio
(0 - 29) Majority of work is neither relevant nor accurate. Often inarticulate and can be incomprehensible Unsatisfactory performance in the majority of areas of the portfolio
Note: For those assessments or partial assessments based on calculation, multiple choice etc. Marks will be gained on an accumulative basis. In these cases, marks allocated to each section will be made clear.
Students must retain an electronic copy of this assignment and it must be made available within 24 hours of them requesting it be submitted.
|
