留学生指导计算机论文需求：Interactive Web Applications

论文题目：Interactive Web Applications
论文语种：英文
您的研究方向：计算机
是否有数据处理要求：否
您的国家：英国
您的学校背景：一般大学
要求字数：1500
论文用途：本科课程论文 BA Assignment
是否需要盲审（博士或硕士生有这个需要）：
补充要求和说明：我已经做了一些工作 现在只要做一个ajax网页和数据库连接进行查询和修改.并且要写一个repot
Please submit the assignment parts in a report folder or simply stapled in one corner – not in polypockets.  The assignment brief and marking scheme should be the front pages of the submission. Students should provide their P number on the front page of the report.
PROVIDE COMPLETED SOURCE CODE ON A CD

Check List

1 Provide a CD containing the code, which must be supplied in an appropriate plastic case and stuck to the back cover of the report. It should be marked with students name and P number.
2 Agree a time for 15 min demonstration of code on.
3 Written report describing the code, etc, and it should be marked with students name and P number.

FAILURE TO MEET THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN THE STUDENTS WORK NOT BEING MARKED.
 

TASK DESCRIPTION

Task
No 
Marking scheme for task(s)
(and lecturer comments where applicable)

 Marks available

 Marks awarded

 2nd marker
1
 Construct a website that uses JavaScript to create visually interesting effects and AJAX to dynamically update the content on the pages. The website must include an example of AJAX polling to periodically fetch information from the website or another source. An example would be a message board that allows a user to add a message and read the messages sent to them.

Demonstrate how these techniques can be used to produce visually very appealing web pages.
Examples of techniques that you may use are:

Rollovers
AJAX to update images e.g. using polling
Dynamically change the HTML in sections of the page
Dynamically change CSS rules to modify the appearance of controls
Display or hide parts of a page based on user choices

You must also demonstrate techniques for obtaining dynamic content and updating the contents of pages using AJAX to interface to a database connection using ASP.Net. The techniques demonstrated must include:-

Reading a table
Modifying a tables contents using AJAX
Polling to periodically update or check for data (may not be a database)

Marks will be awarded for integrating these techniques into a good page design.
 

30

30

10  
2#p#分页标题#e#
 
Write a 1,500 word report a report describing the techniques you used in developing your website.
Illustrate the coding techniques that best represent your work by including coding snippets (very small samples) at appropriate points in your report. Evaluate the benefits of using these techniques? You must include screen shots and details of any technical considerations. This report and the web site will be used to assess your technical understanding of the principles of JavaScript and AJAX programming.
Include a description of:
The XmlHttpRequest object.
Using POST and GET in AJAX.
 
20

10  
 TOTAL 100  

As this course is assessed by assignment only, a high quality deliverable is expected. This assignment counts for 50% of the total marks for the course.

Generic Grading Criteria (Degree)
0-35 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is below the standard required at the current level of your Degree programme. Work falls short of the threshold standards in relation to one or more of knowledge, intellectual, subject based or key skills.  Work is based on only minimal understanding, application or effort.  It will offer only very limited evidence of familiarity with knowledge or skills appropriate to the field of study or task and/or demonstrate inadequate capability in key skills essential to the task concerned. It may address the assessment task to some extent, or include evidence of successful engagement with some of the subject matter, but such satisfactory characteristics will be clearly outweighed by major deficiencies across remaining areas. Other reasons for failing the coursework may include excessive absenteeism; academic dishonesty (cheating), plagiarism or failure to participate in teamwork.

35-39 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is below, but at the upper end is approaching the standard required at the current level of your Degree programme. Whilst some points are correctly presented there are serious errors and/or omissions and/or irrelevant material. It indicates work of an insufficient standard. It will show very limited knowledge or understanding of the relevant subject area, and display weak writing and analytical skills and/or poor application of technique. Writing will exhibit weak grammar, very inadequate or absent references and/or bibliography and may contain major factual errors. Quantitative work will contain significant errors and incorrect conclusions.

40-49

 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of an acceptable standard at the current the level of your Degree programme. Work demonstrates some familiarity with and grasp of a factual/conceptual knowledge base for the field of study and/or ability to employ specialist skills, but only just meeting threshold standards. Work may be characterised by some significant errors, omissions or problems, but there will be sufficient evidence of development and competence. Writing may be poorly presented without properly laid out referencing/bibliography, or in the case of quantitative work, it may not be possible to follow the logic and reasoning leading to the results obtained and the conclusions reached.

50-59 The work is of a satisfactory to very satisfactory standard at the current level of your Degree programme. Work demonstrates ability to evaluate new information, concepts and evidence from a range of sources and generate ideas through the analysis of concepts at an abstract level. Arguments and issues will be discussed and referenced, but these may not be fully documented or detailed. The work will be mostly accurate and provide some evidence of the ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate and apply required methods/techniques. There will be no serious omissions or inaccuracies. There will be good evidence of ability to take responsibility for own learning including the selection and use of relevant techniques and applying creative skills. With Quantitative work it should be possible to follow the logical steps leading to the answer obtained and the conclusions reached.

60-69 A mark in this range is indicative of that the work is of a very good standard for the current level of your Degree programme.  Work of commendable quality commanding wide ranging specialised technical, creative and/or conceptual skills.  There will be consistent evidence of capability in all relevant subject-based skills, including the ability to self-evaluate and work autonomously and to use effectively specified techniques in appropriate contexts.
Writing work will make excellent use of appropriate, fully referenced, detailed examples and there will be clear evidence of analysis, synthesis and evaluation.  Any quantitative work will be clearly presented, the results should be correct and any conclusions clearly and accurately expressed. 

70-84 A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of an excellent standard for the current level of your Degree programme.  Work is based on a rigorous and broad knowledge base, demonstrating ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate concepts and/or interpret and describe the creative expression and the associated workflow process including both the design and development/production considerations.
The work will go beyond that provided on reading lists and include independent work.  There will be strong evidence of competence across a range of specialised skills and the capability to operate autonomously. The work will exhibit excellent levels of knowledge and understanding, with elements of originality and flair.

85-100 A mark in this range is indicative of outstanding work.  Marks in this range will be awarded for work that exhibits excellent levels of knowledge and understanding throughout with substantial elements of originality and flair. The work will demonstrate a broad range of critical reading that goes well beyond that provided on reading lists. Marks at the upper end of the range will indicate that the work is of publishable, or near publishable academic standard.#p#分页标题#e#