加拿大全球化教育问题分析作业

Cantwell和Maldonado（2009）通过分析全球化与高等教育国际化之间的差异来展示高等教育全球化过程中全球化与本土化之间的冲突问题。 Cantwell和Maldonado（2009）认为，在大多数情况下，在高等教育领域，全球水平在地方层面占据首要地位。他们利用吉登斯的结构理论和福柯的治理技术概念来解释全球化相对强势地位的原因，而不是高等教育本土化的原因。他认为全球不对称将持续存在，全球化已经在全球高等教育中产生了更大的分割，这使得一些机构和其他机构处于不利地位。

为了解决这个问题，他们提出了从理论和实践方面进行改进的建议，从研究的角度来看，他们认为在高等教育领域，全球化的研究应该以开放和动态的视角来研究整个过程。国际化，以便找到更公平重排的可能性。从具体实际的角度来看，他们认为全球化和本土化不会相互冲突，但可以相互产生积极的影响，他们认为建立和谐的关系需要建设和重建。社会结构成为可能。

Cantwell and Maldonado (2009) were through analysis on the differences between globalization and internationalization in higher education to show the issues of the conflict between globalization and localization in the process of globalization of higher education. Cantwell and Maldonado (2009) believed that in most cases in the area of higher education, the global level holds primacy over the local level. They made use of Giddens’ theory of structuration and Foucault’s concept of technologies of governance to explain the reasons for the relatively stronger position of globalization than that of localization in higher education. He figured that global asymmetries will persist and that globalization has created grater segmentation in higher education worldwide, which advantaged some institutions and disadvantaged others.

In order to solve this problem, they proposed recommendations from the theoretical and practical aspects for improvement, from the prospective of research, they believed that in the field of higher education, research on globalization should take an open and dynamic perspective to study the whole process of internationalization, so as to find where the potential for more equitable rearrangement exist. From a concrete practical point of view, they held that globalization and localization do not conflict with each other, but can have a positive impact on each other, they thought that the establishment of a harmonious relationship between the two requires that the construction and reconstruction of social structure become possible.