|
MANAGING INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT POLICY
ASSIGNMENT STAGE THREE
In the previous stages of the assignment you have identified and explored a trade policy issue or dispute, and discussed the regulatory basis or influences upon the issue or dispute. In this final stage of 指导英国论文the assignment you are required to evaluate the impact and outcomes of the issue or dispute on a variety of stakeholders that you identify:
Stage three - Using the issue/dispute you have written about previously, evaluate the impact or outcomes of the issue/dispute from the perspective of:
• consumers
• workers
• companies
• governments
and any other stakeholder groups you wish to identify that may have had an interest in the issue/dispute. The word limit for this part of the assignment is 2000 words.
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FEEDBACK:
These are provided in the matrix below specifically criteria 2 and 3. In addition, you should specify which aspects of your assignment you would like feedback on.
TUTOR COMMENTS
The grading scheme below is designed to provide insight into each of the elements which contribute to the assessment criteria:
A = excellent performance/coverage of this aspect
B - very good performance/coverage but less than a comprehensive account
C - good performance/coverage but with some shortcomings/omissions
D - satisfactory performance/coverage, although mixed in terms of coverage, with some important points missing
E - unsatisfactory performance/coverage, with inadequate focus, content or analysis of this aspect.
1 "Evaluate and critique the rationale for and benefits of such regulation from a variety of stakeholder perspectives"
Have you identified a wide range of stakeholder groups?
http://www.ukassignment.org/yingguolunwen/Have you clearly described their interest in the dispute?
Have you provided evidence or data or other ways of illustrating and justifying their interest?
Have you compared and contrasted the different experiences and outcomes from the different stakeholder perspectives, and drawn conclusions or general points?
To what extent have these conclusions or general points been justified?
2 "Analyse the effect and implications of such regulation for international firms and governments in terms of strategy and policy"
Have you commented upon the implications of the process or outcomes of the dispute for the strategies of firms involved?
Have you used concepts and ideas from the academic literature on corporate strategy to support your discussion?
Have you commented upon the implications of the process or outcomes of the dispute for government policies? Have you justified your comments and observations here?
#p#分页标题#e#
MARK:
"I would like feedback on the following aspects of my work:" You wrote:
My comments:
Assessment Criteria
<40% Fail 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% > 70%
1 Explain and comment on the scope, nature and extent of regulation of international trade by international agencies and its historical development Partial and in some places inaccurate review of regulation; inadequate detail on regulatory activities for chosen industry and firms Satisfactory review of regulation, identifying key features and elements, with demonstrable but limited attempt to research industry and company perspectives Satisfactory review of regulation, identifying key features and elements, with review of important aspects of industry and company perspectives, but with variations in the quality of the different aspects of review Comprehensive and well researched review of regulation, using a variety of sources, identifying key features and elements and incorporating sophisticated evaluation of industry and company perspectives based on extensive research, but with weaknesses in a small number of aspects Comprehensive and well researched review of regulation, using a large variety of sources, identifying key features and elements and incorporating sophisticated evaluation of industry and company perspectives based on extensive research, in any aspects
2 Evaluate and critique the rationale for and benefits of such regulation from a variety of stakeholder perspectives Aspects of the chosen regulatory activity are not evaluated using microeconomic concepts and stakeholder analysis in an accurate or comprehensive manner Aspects of the chosen regulatory activity are evaluated using microeconomic concepts and stakeholder analysis so as to provide critique of such regulation but which lacks sophistication and depth Aspects of the chosen regulatory activity are evaluated using microeconomic concepts and stakeholder analysis so as to provide critique of such regulation which identifies a number of different viewpoints on the pros and cons of such regulation Aspects of the chosen regulatory activity are evaluated using microeconomic concepts and stakeholder analysis so as to provide a fulsome critique of such regulation which identifies a number of different viewpoints on the pros and cons of such regulation and synthesises these 指导英国论文into a rounded critique which has some variations in strengths Aspects of the chosen regulatory activity are evaluated using microeconomic concepts and stakeholder analysis so as to provide a fulsome and sophisticated critique of such regulation which identifies a number of different viewpoints on the pros and cons of such regulation and synthesises these into a rounded critique which demonstrates some originality of thought
3 Analyse the effect and implications of such regulation for international firms and governments in terms of strategy and policy Limited, partial or inaccurate discussion of implications of regulation for international firms and governments in terms of strategy and policy Discussion of implications of regulation for international firms and governments which includes a number of defensible points of relevance Discussion of implications of regulation for international firms and governments which includes a large number of defensible points of relevance Discussion of implications of regulation for international firms and governments which includes a large number of defensible #p#分页标题#e#指导英国论文points of relevance synthesised in an analysis which attempts to locate key issues in relevant academic literature Discussion of implications of regulation for international firms and governments which includes a large number of defensible points of relevance synthesised in a sophisticated analysis which attempts to locate key issues in relevant academic literature and which demonstrates some originality of thought
|
