|
不知道大家在写assignment的时候有没有出现过些跑题的情况。有时候导师给出的题目就是很奇怪，从不同的角度解读会有不同的含义，有时候甚至是几个信息点，并没有确定的主题。明明每一个单词都认识，但偏偏有一种“看不懂”的感觉，是不是很苦恼？下面小编就给大家讲讲这些奇怪的assignment主题，以及渡河读题。 比较典型地容易把我们绕进去地出题方式有： 1. 含有因果关系的题目 More people are using mobile phones and computers to communicate. Therefore, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 吐槽时间：手机交流，一般打字和语音。更多时候发点表情包啥的，又没有面对面，怎么会影响面对面的能力呢？ 2. 完全无关的两个 views Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others think that the main benefits are in the world business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 吐槽时间：这两个完全不相关（至少看似不相关的）的领域：环境和全球商业，怎么去 compare，如何能 discuss 的呢？ 3. 完全不冲突的两个 views Employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress at work. They should only care about the quality of the work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 吐槽时间：关注着装，为啥就不能关注工作能力？（穿的好的，就不能好好工作么？） 在给出合理地应对措施之前，先用 GAMT 写作地方式，diss 一下这些题目的逻辑问题。（PS. Gmat 即美国商学院研究生入学考试，写作部分考察方式就是给出一段材料，找到其中地逻辑漏洞。） 针对刚刚着装的题目，或许我会这么写： Initially, there is no clear interrelation between the way job holders dress in the workplace and their work productivity. Even if the given statement is reasonable, exclusively concentrating on the efficiency in work is pointless. There is certainly a myriad of other areas which the business owner should attach importance to, such as the morale during the working hours and the employee’s loyalty to the company. 着装和工作质量，没有直接关系。即使有，只关注工作质量也是不合理的，其他如工作士气和忠诚度，也是应该被考虑的。 In addition, based on the arguer’s consumption, too much concern about the dressing code might be detrimental to the overall performance of the work. However, there is no sufficient evidence which can substantiate this assumption. In some situations, decent dressing might even contribute to the improvement in quality, so that managers’ attention to how staff dress would be for the better in the outcome of the work. 以作者假设来推导的话，注重着装仿佛是一件损害工作质量的事情。但是这也没有任何根据。有时候，得体的着装或许会提高工作质量，所以雇主关注着装，是对于工作成果有好处的。 当然，assignment写作毕竟本质还是考察我们的语言能力，而不是逻辑反驳能力。面对这些的“活见鬼”题目，推荐更合适的处理方式是： 1. 完全分开去写 without using the technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 科技让生活变复杂了，所以我们要简化生活，不用这些新科技？我个人观点是支持前半句，而不支持后半句的。（当然，你也可以前后两个分句都支持，或者都不支持，或者跟我的观点完全相反。） 所以，我们的文章结构就是： 主体段 1：承认科技让生活复杂化了，举例，比如在工作上，明明当面能讲清楚的事情，必须写一封正式的邮件，层层提交审核，耽误事情。 主体段 2：但是不应该放弃对于科技的依赖。因为，太多的工作、生活、学习，已经完全离不开新技术了，比如 email 技术。如果不去使用，反而会带来非常多的麻烦。 真实地去表达自己，把因和果两个部分分开去评论，会让整体更加容易处理。花太多时间纠结这个因果关系，往往适得其反。 N.B. 有的时候，so 前面是一个事实描述，而不是观点，那就没有必要专门去 diss 前者了。比如：针对孩子的广告越来越多，so some people think 他们不好，要控制。 so 前面描述事实，我们不能在文章中说：我没有发现很多针对孩子的广告，所以观点不成立。 2. 折中，承认其不冲突 The government should spend money in promoting sports and art in school, rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 学校里面的推广，和社会层面的推广，我个人是觉得不冲突的。学校培养的是种子，以后会开花结果。而资助专业运动和艺术项目，更加直接，对于此时此刻的体育和艺术产业更好。 两者对我而言，并不冲突。如果一定要比出一二来，反而会特别困难。主体段还是分开去描述，到了结尾，我们承认两边不冲突，建议政府同时支持即可。 In conclusion, investment in sporting and artistic activities in school and support for social events related to sports and arts are equally important and mutually unexclusively. Within budget, the government should finance these two aspects. 3. 折中，分类讨论 Employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress at work. They should only care about the quality of the work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 还是穿衣服这个题目。其实，是否注重着装，需要看情况来讲。比如服务行业，直接面对客户，需要得体地着装，既是为了服务好客户，也是为了表示尊重。 而一些行业，完全不用面对客户，例如程序猿，大部分时候在电脑面前，编辑和优化软件后台，适当放松着装要求，或者即便人字拖，大背心，我觉得也未尝不可。 这一个自己观点的折中段，写出来可以是： Whether the code of dressing should be prioritized in the workplace largely depends on the area of the occupation. As for those working in service industry, who have to directly interact with customers and clients, being well dressed is showing respect. As for those employed in internet companies, for example, they should be allowed to dress casually, since their work responsibilities are mainly related to programming and optimizing the background system. |
 |
|||
| 网站地图 |
